The posts over week 5 have hopefully been proof of the different needs associated with online communities in an effort to determine what aspects I should concentrate on in the micro-ethnography.
Mark Wills’ view that online community encourage communities that are essentially neutral in the embodiment of genderless, ageless and classless notions may perhaps be counterargued by the last few posts for this week which show an inherent need for MOOCs to suit the needs of different types of communities. Being neutral and anonymous might have been a common practice in the first online communities but nowadays online participants seem to feel the need to show who they are and where they come from. This has also been evident in a short investigation of my MOOC which has shown that few people use pseudonyms any more.
This week has also been about the economics of MOOCs. In one of the articles, a major MOOC platform representative of Coursera states that:
At Coursera, we don’t really see ourselves as a MOOC provider, we look at ourselves as a three-sided platform that’s connecting learners, educators and employers.
(Kapeesh Saraf, 2019)
MOOCs might perhaps be realising that it is not just a question of posting material online for everyone to consume but it is about the need to bring together all interested parties in a continuous effort to meet the needs of different communities. Couple this with the need (still evident) of having face-to-face contact and it seems that teachers will not be out of a profession any time soon.
References:
Johnson, S. (2019). Much Ado About MOOCs: Where Are We in the Evolution of Online Courses? Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2019-02-26-much-ado-about-moocs-where-are-we-in-the-evolution-of-online-courses. (Accessed: 15th February 2020).
