Is Education still in the hands of Educators?

Why is education so irresistible for Silicon Valley entrepreneus?

from Diigo https://ift.tt/2xlzCLh
via IFTTT

The field of education has always been fertile ground for Silicon Valley entrepreneurs in search of new opportunities to develop hardware and software advertised as solutions for bettering education under the ‘liberal politics of the technology.’ (Williamson et el, 2018). The culture of a sense of freedom enjoyed by these companies in political and economic terms, as described by Williamson et al (2018)   is one of the driving forces behind the implementation of new technological trends in various sections of society.

Ferenstein (2015) terms the new Silicon Valley liberals ‘civicrats,’ or ‘techDemocrats,’ whose goal is to make everyone innovative, healthy, civic and educated, and see government’s role as an investor in maximizing people’s contribution to the economy and society.
(cited in Williamson et el, 2018)
What Ferenstein describes is a mentality which believes that anything can be solved having the right tools and resources…that humans are fundamentally ‘faulty’ and that issues concerning human limitations can be solved through technology. It is perhaps the same impetus that drives pioneers of technology to often redefine schooling in terms of what their technologies can ‘solve’ rather than how technologies can change pedagogies and design of syllabi. They flutter their banner of innovation based on the idea of ‘charter’ schools, independent centres that are funded to experiment freely from academic legislation governing other types of schools with the scope of showing how technologies are one big solution to most educational limitations (Williamson et el, 2018)

The idea of education as a capitalist goldmine has meant that any serious enterprise willing to invest in education has been required to break the learning process into quantifiable data (datafication). This is the same as a live update feeds on stock markets at Wall Street. Williamson (2017) describes how recent developments in technology have concerned themselves with the real-time collection of data pertaining to the way people learn in order to provide more personalised learning experiences. An example of this is the Silicon Schools Fund in America which promotes the creation of

 ‘laboratories of innovation and proof points for personalized learning (Williamson et al, 2018):

Schools that give each student a highly-personalized education, by combining the best of traditional education with the transformative power of technology

 Students gaining more control over the path and pace of their learning, creating better schools and better outcomes

Software and online courses that provide engaging curriculum, combined with real-time student data, giving teachers the information they need to support each student

Teachers developing flexibility to do what they do bestinspire, facilitate conversations, and encourage critical thinking

Personalised learning also advocates against standardized methods of testing and learning, pushing instead towards tailor-made solutions dependent on the collection of data similar to that experienced when shopping online, using GPS data, searching or booking flights. This personalization is possible because huge amounts of data can be collected, stored and kept while algorithms constantly check any developments in patterns and behaviour. While admirable in many ways, one questions how this data can be used in other ways that benefit companies to promote their goods.
References:
Williamson, B. 2017. Introduction: Learning machines, digital data and the future of education (chapter 1). In Big Data and Education: the digital future of learning, policy, and practice. Sage.

Williamson, B., Means, A. & Saltman, K. (2018).Startup Schools, Fast Policies, and Full-Stack Education Companies. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327404706_Startup_Schools_Fast_Policies_and_Full-Stack_Education_Companies. (Accessed: 11th March 2020).

Images obtained and modified from https://pixabay.com

Can technology cheat death?

Miller (2011) determines one of the main aims of extropianism and transhumanism as the chance to transcend the fragility and limitations of the human body.

This article by Saphora Smith (2018) describes some of the attempts by pioneers in the field to develop immortality by digitizing the brain through scanning technologies. While technology is making this target seem ever closer, it is not the storage of memory after death that is being questioned but the ability to store consciousness.

Similarly, some people question the scope of living forever or as the great Freddie Mercury once sang ‘Who wants to live forever‘. Others question the role of the soul or spirit after death. Where does technology stop prolonging life and start promoting immortality?

References:

Miller, V. (2011). The Body and Information Technology. Understanding digital culture. pp.207-223. London: Sage.

Saphora, S., (2018) ‘Disrupting death:  Technologists explore ways to digitize life’ NBCNews, 25th July, Culture. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/tech/your-brain-cloud-how-tech-world-wants-disrupt-death-ncna894191 (Accessed: 23rd January 2020).

A humorous advert that shows that ultimately limitations are for humans.

 

SMART HOUSE – ENGLISH VERSION – REMA 1000
The film opens in a smart home, where the slightly smug owner can do everything from making a smoothie to unlocking the front door simply by voice command. Everything runs smooth until a trip to the dentist and a numbing Novocaine injection…

Rema 1000 is a Norwegian supermarket chain. For many years they have ran their marketing concept: “Simplicity is king” wich is also their philosophy.
via YouTube https://youtu.be/nwPtcqcqz00

Computers start composing.

When Robots Write Songs

I have often wondered while hearing the songs being dished out nowadays on radio, what (rather than who) is behind them. Perhaps certain types of music lend themselves better to the digital realm of metallic beat and pulsating lights, but this article makes it clear that all kinds of music can be created using algorithms and even enable computers to ‘swing’.

The article also makes it clear that it is not only the music that is being computer-generated but the persona of the composer or DJ can also be replaced by a robot. I wonder here whether the instrumentalist view of technology is not established by the scope of using technology for technology’s sake. Can technology, as Hamilton and Friesen (2013) argue, be inseparable from human context…or is human context an excuse to use technology to develop cheaper and more lucrative forms of media?

from Diigo https://ift.tt/1vf0Par
via IFTTT

References:

Hochberg, W., (2014) ‘WHen Robots Write Songs’ The Atlantic, 7th August, Culture. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/ 2014/08/computers-that-compose/374916/. (Accessed: 19th January 2020).

Hamilton, E., and Friesen, N. (2013). Online education: a science and technology studies perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(2), pp. 1-21.

Computers start painting.

This fake Rembrandt was created by an algorithm.

Credit:Microsoft/ING/Delft University of Technology.

It is amazing how even a masterpiece by one of the greatest Dutch painters of all time can be deconstructed and recreated by computer and 3D printing, imitating not simply the graphical aspect but also the texture and feel fo the paint. How long before deep learning algorithms can be used to create new works of art that are unrecognisable in style from that of the masters?

Entire article found here: from Diigo https://ift.tt/38nfdCG
via IFTTT

References:

Reynolds, E., (2016) ‘This fake Rembrandt was created by an algorithm’. Available at:https://www.wired.co.uk/article/new-rembrandt-painting-computer-3d-printed (Accessed:19th January 2020).