Week 3-Tying up

This week was a bit of a juggle bringing together the readings, posts and completing the artefact. My postings have ranged from delving into film culture and feminism, education and technology and today’s video post on AI and the predictions made in the spread of the coronavirus. Quite a mix to say the least and a close representation of what was going on inside my head 😊.

Although I have heard and enjoyed watching and listening to success stories brought about by the implementation of technology, sometimes the ideas tend to put me slightly on edge. What seems in, a way as a straightforward leap from nothing to everything (possibly in areas or countries with different socioeconomic backgrounds) makes me wonder if one needs special super-insight into stripping the learning process to its very fundamentals and applying technology to it. I often find that over-analysing the use of technology and how it benefits education often blindfolds educators into simply providing the means to search for information and allowing learners to enjoy the process of discovery. Many times, and in my experience the use of technology needs to be mired in protocols, time constraints, syllabi and educator training. Why do some people find it easy using social networking platforms, sharing, buying online and a host of other things but then still find it difficult to implement similar technologies within class sessions?

Finally, the video on the paradigm shift in the use of digital time is something I would like to develop later on as it can perhaps offer an insight in the way older generations find it difficult to relate to younger ones on the uses of technology. Perhaps older generations still tend to use technology in a sequential manner, allocating time for it and range of use while for younger generations it becomes an extension of their physical, psychological and even emotional selves.

Liked on YouTube: Tracking the spread of coronavirus and other deadly diseases with AI

An interesting point raised in this video is the problem of fake data (like fake news) that can skew the way AI systems determine outcomes for modelling/simulation exercises like the one mentioned here.

 

Tracking the spread of coronavirus and other deadly diseases with AI
Ann Marie Sastry, Amesite CEO, says artificial intelligence can help fight the spread of coronavirus and help health officials treat patients more efficiently. She joins Yahoo Finance’s Julie Hyman, Adam Shapiro, Dan Howley, Jared Blikre and Proshares’ Simeon Hyman.
#coronavirus #AI #China #artificialintelligence
Subscribe to Yahoo Finance: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb

About Yahoo Finance:
At Yahoo Finance, you get free stock quotes, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, international market data, social interaction and mortgage rates that help you manage your financial life.

Connect with Yahoo Finance:
Get the latest news: https://yhoo.it/2fGu5Bb
Find Yahoo Finance on Facebook: http://bit.ly/2A9u5Zq
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter: http://bit.ly/2LMgloP
Follow Yahoo Finance on Instagram: http://bit.ly/2LOpNYz
via YouTube https://youtu.be/4q46R8M4kag

Liked on YouTube: Can Technology Change Education? Yes!: Raj Dhingra at TEDxBend

https://youtu.be/l0s_M6xKxNc

“Sometimes it takes someone who has worked in the industry to provide new insights into the way technology can shape education. On the other hand, these are always success stories that find their way to the internet. Presumably, there are others that never quite left off the ground or failed mid-way. This is not meant as a negative comment but with education, especially education with the younger generation, there are so many factors that come into play. The novelty or WOW element and the way technology is presented make a lot of a difference.”

Can Technology Change Education? Yes!: Raj Dhingra at TEDxBend
Raj Dhingra is a twenty-year veteran of the technology industry with an extensive track record of building strong, sustainable and profitable industry leadership positions in new and emerging categories. Raj brings entrepreneurial drive and success, and a rich depth of corporate experience across general management, business development, product development, sales and marketing functions. Prior to joining NComputing in April 2011, Raj was VP and GM at Citrix where he led the company’s desktop virtualization business from zero to half a billion dollars growth in sales over a 3 year period. As well as his leadership role in global virtualization companies such as Citrix, Dhingra has held executive leadership positions in public companies such as McAfee, 3Com, SonicWALL and startups such as IntruVert Networks (acquired by McAfee) and PortAuthority Technologies (acquired by Websense).

In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)
via YouTube https://youtu.be/l0s_M6xKxNc

Week 2- From philosophical ideals to practicality.

The above is an image which I had included in one of my posts during IDEL and which seems to depict one of the risks of mass-produced educational programs through technology as it tends towards the ‘universalism’ described by Knox (2015) which can also give rise to the idea that the goal of education is the creation of rational thinking.

This week has brought me closer to the philosophies behind the use of technology. The hopeful views promoted by posthumanism and the ideals supporting transhumanist trends are thrilling, to say the least. On another note, there are still those, like Bayne(2015) who advocate towards the importance of the social aspect in the integration of technology within education.

Bayne’s(2015) view that ‘Reducing a field of such complexity and importance to the terminology and limitations of TEL’ while ‘positioning the ‘material’ and technological aspect as separate from and subordinate to social practice’, thereby negating the entirety of the human, is somehow vaguely reminiscent of some of Rosi Braidotti’s perspectives on technology in a posthuman world. The call for technology as a solution to various things (amongst them education) or as an upgrade for those who can afford it, often stops short from addressing other human maladies that could be caused by technologies such as poverty, the environmental damage caused by the same materials used for manufacturing technologies that are short-lived and ‘the appropriation of nature as resource for the productions of culture’ (Harraway, 2007) while a general sense of alienation seems to permeate throughout.

While technology has, and still will, give much to the world, nothing can be gained by demolishing one world to build another. Although we do live in a world calibrated by digital time, in which the past seems long gone and the future always at hand it is only by bringing the fruits of the labour of those before us and merge them with the modern that a holistic ideal can be truly achieved.

Bayne, S., (2015). What’s the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), pp. 5-20, https://doi.org.ezproxy. is.ed.uk/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851

Harraway, D. (2007). A Cyborg Manifesto. Bell, David; Kennedy, Barbara M (eds), The cybercultures reader pp.34-65, London: Routledge.

Knox, J., (2015). Critical Education and Digital Cultures. Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, pp. 1-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.0.1007/978-981-287-532-7_124-1.

Can technology cheat death?

Miller (2011) determines one of the main aims of extropianism and transhumanism as the chance to transcend the fragility and limitations of the human body.

This article by Saphora Smith (2018) describes some of the attempts by pioneers in the field to develop immortality by digitizing the brain through scanning technologies. While technology is making this target seem ever closer, it is not the storage of memory after death that is being questioned but the ability to store consciousness.

Similarly, some people question the scope of living forever or as the great Freddie Mercury once sang ‘Who wants to live forever‘. Others question the role of the soul or spirit after death. Where does technology stop prolonging life and start promoting immortality?

References:

Miller, V. (2011). The Body and Information Technology. Understanding digital culture. pp.207-223. London: Sage.

Saphora, S., (2018) ‘Disrupting death:  Technologists explore ways to digitize life’ NBCNews, 25th July, Culture. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/tech/your-brain-cloud-how-tech-world-wants-disrupt-death-ncna894191 (Accessed: 23rd January 2020).

The posthumanist prophets of the 21st century.

While the posthuman is an area that has gathered quite a lot of contention, the views embraced by David Simpson and Rosi Braidotti give an idea of both ends of the spectrum of thought. David’s presentation is full of hope for a future that, given the right checks and controls will create an age of super-intelligent humans and machines that could also be characterized by super empathy. David manages to coalesce the idea that above-average intelligence (through examples like philanthropist Bill Gates) is proportional to a strong sense of empathy. While dubious in the sense that not all super-intelligent people are good empathisers, he presents the notion as the cherry on the cake, in an unavoidable race towards the super-intelligent organism. In other words, we need not fear AI, virtuality and transhumanism because they can be managed by good people.

Rosi Braidotti’s speech is several notches more complex as it is embedded in history and culture of humanism and post-humanism but she brings out a couple of enlightening points. Technologies are there for those that can afford them. While technologically-developed countries can afford to step-up their powers, third world countries are wallowing in the debris and garbage that comes from a society that generates huge amounts of electronic waste with poor communities that live on the edges of these digital waste favelas. (which reminded me of several films and animations like Blade Runner, WallE and the Matrix) . It is true that we are moving towards an age of posthumanism, yet the world has failed to control climate change, poverty, migration and a number of other maladies that have been discussed for the past decades.

VS

Liked on YouTube: Our Post-Human Future | David Simpson | TEDxSantoDomingo

 

Our Post-Human Future | David Simpson | TEDxSantoDomingo
-In 15 years the human specie is going to develop super human level machine intelligence
-What it means to be Super-Human?
-The country with Artificial Intelligence will be the country on top

David Simpson is the best-selling novelist of the Post-Human series, a Kindle All-Star and has been ranked the most popular scifi Author in America by Amazon.com. He has filmed a short proof-of-concept based on his series, is an award-winning teacher and holds a Master’s degree in literature from the University of British Columbia.

David is a full example of believing in the story in your head and getting it published. He is been part of the story-telling business since his twenties. He went out of the ‘Book Industry Professionals ways’ and took the risk of not hearing the voice of those ‘who knew’ about scifi books. Now he is living his dream of been a full time scifi author and maybe he can help us dream into the realms of a Post-Human not so far future.

This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at http://ted.com/tedx
via YouTube https://youtu.be/uAb-mSq615g