This week has been very busy with travelling so I didn’t have that much time to spend on my lifestream in the second half of the week.
The tutorial was really helpful and it was great to share exeriences about our chosen MOOCs. It made me think more about the ethical issues of my micro-ethnography. I’m going to post a message on the forum that I’m planning to use for my study to make others aware. I originally thought that I wouldn’t have to do this because I’m not planning to identify anyone but Jeremy clarified that just because someone isn’t identified we have the right to use the content they have shaped. And just because something is public doesn’t mean that it is ethical to use in research. boyd & Crawford (2012:672) raise some important questions: ‘Should someone be included as a part of a large aggregate of data? What if someone’s ‘public’ blog post is taken out of context and analyzed in a way that the author never imagined? What does it mean for someone to be spotlighted or to be analyzed without knowing it? Who is responsible for making certain that individuals and communities are not hurt by the research process? What does informed consent look like?’ They remind us that ‘In order to act ethically, it is important that researchers reflect on the importance of accountability: both to the field of research and to the research subjects.’
References:
danah boyd & Kate Crawford (2012) CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA,
Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, 662-679, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878



