Week 4 summary

Week 4 marked the start of a new block which I was quite excited about. Although we briefly dipped into MOOCs in IDEL, I’m looking forward to exploring the community aspect a bit more. In the MOOCs I’ve taken so far I never really paid much attention to the discussions so it’ll be interesting to see what I can find out in my ethnography.

faces
Community (Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay)

I started the week off with looking at and commenting on other visual artefacts. It was really impressive to see such creativity and wide range of media used to explore different themes.

I then began to look at different MOOCs for my ethnography. Since I recently started Chinese classes I thought a Chinese beginners class would be great but the forums weren’t very exciting. There wasn’t much of a discussion – students just wanted to know whether their homework was correct. I then come across this course on Ecodesign for Cities and Suburbs by edX. I find the topic very interesting but also found the discussion boards quite lively. I’m not sure what angle to focus on yet but I’m hoping to narrow it down next week. As I mentioned in one of my posts, I found the constant advertising by the provider very distracting and wondered what the real purpose of MOOCs is.

While reading some of the literature for this block, I also explored some key terms such as ethnography, netnography and communities of practice. I found it hard to find the time this week to do much reading but hoping to catch up next week.

MOOCs and the real reason behind them

I decided to enrol in the MOOC ‘Ecodesign for Cities and Suburbs’ (https://www.edx.org/course/ecodesign-for-cities-and-suburbs) as I’m very interested in this topic but I also found a lot of comments on the discussion boards so I’m hoping to find a good angle for my ethnography.

urban development

What struck me was the constant reminders to sign up for a verified certificate. I have done a MOOC with EdX before but I can’t remember that the message was so obvious. At the top and bottom of each page there seems to be a reminder to sign up for the certificate, which I find very distracting. It made we think what the actual reason behind MOOCs is. Is it really to offer free education to as many people as possible or is actually for profit? Education means big business these days so I’m guessing that it is the latter. The fact the most MOOCs run for years with minimal intervention from faculty or moderators supports this feeling.

Ten Years Later: Why Open Educational Resources Have Not Noticeably Affected Higher Education, and Why We Should Care

Relatively old article but probably still mostly relevant? It’s ironic that ‘[t]oday’s MOOCs make limited use of OERs — most content is custom-produced and not openly licensed.’

When MIT first announced its Open Courseware (OCW) initiative in October 2002, it shook the business model of traditional higher education institutions that had established “virtual universities” in an attempt to sell their brand and their educational resources worldwide.

from Pocket http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/2/ten-years-later-why-open-educational-resources-have-not-noticeably-affected-higher-education-and-why-we-should-care
via IFTTT

Moocs: students in the global south are wary of a ‘sage on the stage’

Unless universities adapt the curriculum to suit the needs of students in emerging economies, free online courses will have no relevance Free online courses, known by the acronym Moocs (massive open online courses), have the potential to educate anyone, anywhere and reach the world’s under-served.

from Pocket https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/mar/19/cost-barrier-students-global-south
via IFTTT